Shreya was unhappy with Amit’s intrusive behaviour, his ways of establishing personal connection and his insistence to meet outside office. Amit being her Team Leader, Shreya was finding it difficult to reprimand him about his conduct though it made her very uneasy. Shreya, also didn’t know whom to approach with the Company to express her concern. While she was contemplating to speak to HR, Shreya attended a PoSH training arranged by the Company. On gaining required information, Shreya filed a complaint to the Internal Complaints Committee of the company. In this article, we will look at the inquiry procedure that is conducted by ICC members after the complaint is reported.

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 has laid down the inquiry procedure and rules in detail that are to be followed by Internal Committee on receipt of complaint of sexual harassment. We shall divide the procedure into three parts, viz., a) Pre inquiry procedure b) Inquiry proceedings c) Submission of report.

Let us first go through the timelines set out by the law with respect to the inquiry proceedings –

Submission of complaint (in written form)Within 3 months of occurrence of last incident.
Notice to the respondentWithin 7 days of receipt of such complaint
Respondent to respond to the complaint in writingWithin 10 days from the receipt of information regarding complaint from the Internal Committee
Completion of inquiryWithin 90 days from receipt of complaint
Submission of report to district officer/employer as the case may beWithin 10 days from completion of inquiry
Implementation of recommendationsWithin 60 days from receipt of the report
AppealWithin 90 days from the date of recommendations

Pre-inquiry procedure

  • Determine if the complaint is of “sexual harassment”

In, Shri Debdulal Maity vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors, WP No.728 of 2014, The Calcutta High Court specified that, “the Act does not require the IC to mechanically issue a notice upon receipt of complaint. The IC should apply its mind to determine whether the complaint relates to sexual harassment and whether the incident has happened at workplace.” The court further stated that it is only on the basis of this finding, IC may attempt conciliation under section 10 or begin an inquiry under section 11.

Investigation of the complaint and to determine if it, prima facie reveals allegation of sexual harassment is a crucial step. Such investigation can be done with the following points of consideration, such as –

  1. The respondent displayed a potentially improper and/or offensive conduct which may come within workplace sexual harassment
  2. The behaviour was directed at the complainant
  3. The complainant experienced harm
  4. The behaviour occurred at workplace
  5. If the complaint is submitted within the prescribed period of three months from the occurrence of last incidence.

If the complaint is a sexual harassment complaint and is being submitted within the timeframe, IC should take cognizance of such complaint. Respondent should be informed about such complaint by sending a copy of the same, within 7 days from receipt of such complaint. Respondent should also be made aware of the fact that he/she needs to submit his explanation towards the complaint received, within 10 days from receipt of such notice from IC.

With respect to submission of complaint within three months from the occurrence of incidence, In Tejinder Kaur Vs Union of India, The Delhi High Court (WP 5928/2016), the court stated that, “Internal Complaints Committee may for the reasons recorded in writing, extend the time limit to submit the complaint, if it is satisfied that there were circumstances, which prevented the woman from filing a complaint. However, such period cannot be extended for more than 3 months.”

  • Interim Relief

Before commencement of inquiry, at the request of complainant, IC may pass interim orders if found necessary. Interim orders/interim relief is for example, an order for long leave or change of department or transfer or change of workplace. This is intended to safeguard the aggrieved woman from further suffering.

  • Conciliation

Before commencement of inquiry and only at the request of complainant IC may initiate conciliation. Monetary settlement cannot be a part/way of conciliation.  Conciliation is a tool that can be used solely by the complainant and should not be at the discretion of any other party. IC should take care that this option should not be abused by the employer or any other party by pressurising complainant.

IC should record the statement and details of conciliation and may forward the same to employer for necessary compliance.

Inquiry Proceedings

The Committee shall proceed to make an inquiry into the complaint in accordance with provisions of the Law. The respondent, complainant and the witnesses be informed about the hearing at least 7 days in advance in writing with date, time and place for the proceedings. Requisite quorum for the hearings, i.e., at least 3 members, the Presiding officer, member representing employees and an external member should be present for the hearings.

While conducting proceedings, minutes of each meeting should be recorded and duly signed by IC members and copies should be given to each party involved. The IC should then follow the below mentioned procedure and conduct the inquiry –

  1. Examine the Complainant and Respondent
  2. Cross examination
  3. Re-examination
  4. Examination and Cross examination of witnesses
  5. Findings
  6. Preparation of  a report

It is essential to conduct inquiry proceedings in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The Delhi High Court in Prof. Bidyut Chakraborty Vs Delhi University and others (WP 8226/2007), set aside the decision given by the inquiry committee on the basis of gross violation of principles of natural justice. In another case, Ashok Kumar Singh Vs University of Delhi, The Delhi court, discussed ways to undertake cross examination and emphasized that the inquiry should be based on principles of natural justice.

Internal Committee should record every detail of the procedure, any alterations made in the timelines and reasons thereto as well. It should ensure that both the parties have all sets of documents to ensure transparency.

Based on the observations of the proceedings, the Internal Committee may then prepare a report.

Preparation and submission of report

Once the information and review are complete, IC will prepare the report based on the reasoning and findings. IC should –

  • Identify admitted and disputed facts
  • Assess evidence
  • Comment on any underlying factor that may have contributed to the incident
  • Compare similarities and differences within each of the statements made by the interviewees

Based on the above, the IC must arrive at a finding of whether the complaint is upheld or not or is inconclusive. As per the findings, IC shall then make appropriate recommendations which may include –

  1. If the IC is unable to uphold the complaint, it shall recommend no action
  2. If the IC upholds the complaint, it may recommend a written apology, warning, withholding promotion, withholding increments, undergoing counselling, carry out community service, termination, or any other punishment in accordance with the service rules applicable
  3. The IC may also recommend to pay compensation to complainant, deciding the amount on the basis of, mental trauma, suffering, medical expenses, loss of opportunity etc, the income and financial status of respondent, feasibility of payment.
  4. If the IC concludes that the complaint is malicious, it may recommend to the employer to take appropriate action for misconduct as per service rules

Submission of report 

A detailed report should be prepared by the IC and be submitted to the employer within 10 days from the date of completion of inquiry.

Time and again, the courts have highlighted the need for robust and complete inquiry proceedings and also have refrained from interfering with the decision of IC where such procedure was followed. As seen in Vidya Akhave Vs Union of India case, the court confirmed the decision given by IC. As against in Jaya Kodate Vs. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and others, the Bombay high court, heard this case in 2 parts. Where the matter of sexual harassment was discussed in the later part, In the first part the court gave utter importance to adherence to various provisions and the same were discussed elaborately. This case stands vital as it discussed and debated various issues like difference of opinion of Committee members, constitution of IC and submission of reports.

In light of such cases, it is imperative for the IC to follow the proper procedure laid down under law for conducting an inquiry in a case for sexual harassment  

Referred cases –

  1. Shri Debdulal Maity vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors, WP No.728 of 2014
  2. Tejinder Kaur Vs Union of India, The Delhi High Court WP 5928 of 2016
  3. Prof. Bidyut Chakraborty Vs Delhi University and others WP 8226 of 2007
  4. Ashok Kumar Singh Vs University of Delhi CM No.15732 of 2017
  5. Vidya Akhave Vs Union of India Writ Petition No. 796 Of 2015
  6. Jaya Kodate Vs. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and others WP no 3449 of 2013

Authors –

Mrudula Arjunwadkar ( B.Sc, LLB, MPM )

Vaishali Bhagwat ( BCS, LL.B) Advocate

Leave a Reply

DISCLAIMER

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, a law firm is not permitted to advertise or solicit work. By proceeding to use this website, you acknowledge that you wish to know more about the firm and its Advocates for your own information and use. The information provided under this website is available on an as-is basis at your request and without any express or implied warranty of any kind and does not create any attorney-client relationship.

By clicking “I Agree”, You acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever to solicit any work or advertise through this website. The purpose of this website is to provide the user with information about the specialization, practice areas and work of the firm and its Advocates and this information is provided only on the user’s specific request. The firm and its Advocates are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/ information provided under this website. In cases where the user requires any assistance, he/she must seek independent legal advice. The content of this website is Intellectual Property of the firm.